Political parties participating in the National Consensus Commission’s discussions have almost reached a final decision on implementing the July National Charter, said BNP Standing Committee member Salahuddin Ahmed on Sunday.
Speaking to reporters after the fourth day of talks with the Commission at Foreign Service Academy in the capital, Salahuddin said, “We are now in the final stage regarding the implementation process… I believe we have nearly reached a final decision.”
On the proposal for a referendum, he said, “The question is whether all political parties together truly represent the entire population. So, if the people’s consent is sought — to confirm whether they support the July National Charter that we, the political parties, have signed and committed to — that will be the people’s ultimate opinion on implementing the Charter.”
Salahuddin noted that constitutional amendment is not required to hold a referendum. “The fascist Awami League government had scrapped Article 142 concerning referendums, but it has since been reinstated through a High Court verdict. There is now no constitutional bar to holding a referendum. Therefore, an ordinance could authorize the Election Commission to hold a referendum on the same day as the parliamentary election using a separate ballot,” he explained.
He added, “The people’s verdict through a referendum will carry sovereign authority — all members of parliament will be bound to accept it.”
When asked whether a future parliament with a majority opposing the July Charter would still be obliged to accept the outcome, Salahuddin replied, “The people’s verdict is final. Once it favors the Charter, the parliament and its members must honor it.”
Regarding the existence of “notes of dissent” from some parties on parts of the Charter, Salahuddin clarified, “The July Charter will be drafted, signed, and endorsed by all. It will be made public through websites and party manifestos so people know what it contains. Those who win the mandate may proceed according to their respective notes of dissent.”
