Thursday | 24 April 2025 | Reg No- 06
Bangla
   
Bangla | Thursday | 24 April 2025 | Epaper
BREAKING: Australia wants free, fair elections in Bangladesh      Pakistan Foreign Minister due Sunday      Human chain urges swift reopening of Malaysian labor market       Bangladesh want to be top manufacturing country in world      KUET VC, Pro-VC resign      Bangladesh, WB sign $850m deals to boost trade, create jobs      KUET students cheer, end fast      

The other side of international crisis group

Published : Thursday, 20 March, 2025 at 10:33 PM  Count : 4645
Since its founding, the International Crisis Group (ICG) has portrayed itself as a neutral and independent organization focused on conflict resolution. However, a closer look at its actions suggests that it often serves Western geopolitical interests under the cover of humanitarianism. Established in 1995, the ICG has repeatedly produced reports and recommendations that closely align with the strategic goals of Western powers, particularly the United States and its allies.

For example, during the 2011 Libya crisis, the ICG advocated for international intervention, citing the need to protect civilians. This stance conveniently aligned with NATO’s broader objective of regime change. The aftermath—civil war, widespread chaos, and a humanitarian disaster—exposed the flaws in the ICG’s so-called expertise in conflict prevention. Similarly, in Syria, the ICG’s reports consistently pushed for support to Western-backed opposition groups while downplaying the complexities of the conflict and the role of foreign interference. This selective narrative helped justify Western intervention, further destabilizing the region.

The ICG’s financial backing raises further doubts about its neutrality. Major funders include the U.S. State Department, the European Union, and governments like the UK and Germany—all with vested interests in global power dynamics. In Venezuela, for instance, the ICG has consistently advocated for international pressure on the Maduro government, a position that mirrors US efforts to isolate leftist regimes in Latin America. Its reports frequently highlight authoritarianism and human rights violations but often overlook the severe humanitarian impact of sanctions and foreign interference. Similarly, in Myanmar, the ICG’s emphasis on the Rohingya crisis—while a serious issue—has been used to justify greater Western influence in the region.

The ICG’s legacy is one of contradiction, serving as a reminder of how organizations can be used to further the interests of powerful nations under the pretense of peacebuilding.

The writer is Editor of Geopolits.com and author of the book Bengal Nexus


LATEST NEWS
MOST READ
Also read
Editor : Iqbal Sobhan Chowdhury
Published by the Editor on behalf of the Observer Ltd. from Globe Printers, 24/A, New Eskaton Road, Ramna, Dhaka.
Editorial, News and Commercial Offices : Aziz Bhaban (2nd floor), 93, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Phone: PABX- 41053001-06; Online: 41053014; Advertisement: 41053012.
E-mail: [email protected], news©dailyobserverbd.com, advertisement©dailyobserverbd.com, For Online Edition: mailobserverbd©gmail.com
🔝
close