Why is Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's house at Dhanmondi 32 being demolished under the banner of "Chhatra Janata" or by those claiming to represent them? Especially when no one lives there, nor dares to stay there anymore.
Did Sheikh Hasina herself trigger this event? Is this a consequence of her continuous speeches and provocative programs from India, which could be seen as an incitement? Could this be part of a calculated move to reignite the hope of Awami League�s return to power or its rehabilitation in Bangladesh?
The demolition of this house carries symbolic significance, it might serve as a stark indication of how difficult it will be for Awami League to reclaim its position in Bangladesh. Does this suggest a broad consensus, transcending political divisions that Awami League will no longer be allowed to regain its footing in the country?
Or perhaps, for now, the best course of action for the party leader is to refrain from provoking her followers any further.
Dhanmondi 32 holds deep political significance for Awami League. Many historic decisions for both the party and the country were once made here.
India has never built a state-to-state relationship with Bangladesh. Rather, the relationship has always been between India and Hasina�s Awami League. As a result, over the years, a deep-seated anti-India sentiment has grown among the people of Bangladesh.
Now, after committing mass atrocities in Bangladesh, Hasina has fled and found refuge in India. By sheltering someone accused of genocide, India has further fueled public resentment.
At this moment, couldn�t India have restrained her from making public statements? By doing so, India might have created a better opportunity to reintegrate Hasina into Bangladesh�s political landscape again but slowly.
This place could have been Awami League�s last refuge of hope. By destroying it, perhaps Chhatra Janata wants to send a message that fascism will no longer be tolerated in this country. Only time will tell how, or if, Awami League can make a comeback in Bangladesh
