“Gains” the US made in Afghanistan
The war The US is waging in Afghanistan is highly costly. Brown University's Costs of War Project made some calculations of the war years ago. Now, the high cost is being discussed in the circles of the mainstream politics and media. The New York Times in its "What Did the US Get for $2 Trillion in Afghanistan?" report on December 11, 2019 again raises the issue.
The NYT report said, "all told, the cost of nearly 18 years of war in Afghanistan will amount to more than $2 trillion. Was the money well spent?"
"There is little to show for it. The Taliban control much of the country. Afghanistan remains one of the world's largest sources of refugees and migrants. More than 2,400 US soldiers and more than 38,000 Afghan civilians have died."
The report cites some gains as it said, "still, life has improved, particularly in the country's cities, where opportunities for education have grown. Many more girls are now in school. And democratic institutions have been built - although they are shaky at best." It said, "drawing on estimates from Brown University's Costs of War Project, we assessed how much the US spent on different aspects of the war and whether that spending achieved its aims.
$1.5 trillion waging war:
The Taliban control or contest much of the country. When President George W Bush announced the first military action in Afghanistan in the wake of terrorist attacks by al-Qaida in 2001, he said the goal was to disrupt terrorist operations and attack the Taliban.
Eighteen years later, the Taliban are steadily getting stronger. They kill Afghan security force members - sometimes hundreds in a week - and defeat government forces in almost every major engagement, except when significant American air support is used against them.
Al-Qaida's senior leadership moved to Pakistan, but the group has maintained a presence in Afghanistan and expanded to branches in Yemen, northern Africa, Somalia and Syria. The $1.5 trillion in war spending remains opaque, but the Defense Department declassified breakdowns of some of the three most recent years of spending. Most of the money detailed in those breakdowns - about 60per cent each year - went to things like training, fuel, armored vehicles and facilities. Transportation, such as air and sea lifts, took up about 8per cent, or $3 billion to $4 billion a year. The NYT raised the issue of narcotics, and said:
"$10 billion on counternarcotics":
Afghanistan supplies 80 per cent of the world's heroin. In a report last year, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction described counternarcotics efforts as a "failure." Despite billions of dollars to fight opium poppy cultivation, Afghanistan is the source of 80per cent of global illicit opium production. Before the war, Afghanistan had almost completely eradicated opium, according to United Nations data from 1996 to 2001, when the Taliban were in power.
Today, opium cultivation is a major source of income and jobs, as well as revenue for the Taliban. Other than war expenditures, it is Afghanistan's biggest economic activity. The report cited the cost of training Afghan military and police, which is a huge amount:
"$87 billion to train Afghan military and police forces":
Afghan forces can't support themselves. One of the major goals of the US effort has been to train thousands of Afghan troops. Most of US spending on reconstruction has gone to a fund that supports the Afghan Army and police forces through equipment, training and funding. But nobody in Afghanistan - not the US military, and not President Ashraf Ghani's top advisers - thinks Afghan military forces could support themselves. The Afghan Army in particular suffers from increasing casualty rates and desertion, which means they have to train new recruits totaling at least a third of their entire force every year.
President Barack Obama had planned to hand over total responsibility for security to the Afghans by the end of 2014 and to draw down all US forces by 2016. That plan faltered when the Taliban took quick advantage and gained ground. The US military had to persuade first Obama, and then President Donald Trump, to ramp up forces. Some 14,000 US troops remained in the country as of this month." It said about economic development and poverty in Afghanistan:
"$24 billion on economic development":
Most Afghans still live in poverty. War-related spending has roughly doubled the size of Afghanistan's economy since 2007. But it has not translated into a healthy economy. A quarter or more of Afghans are unemployed and the economic gains have trailed off since 2015, when the international military presence began to draw down. Overseas investors still balk at Afghanistan's corruption - among the worst in the world, according to Transparency International, an anticorruption group - and even Afghan companies look for cheaper labor from India and Pakistan.
Hopes of self-sufficiency in the mineral sector, which the Pentagon boasted could be worth $1 trillion, have been dashed. A few companies from China and elsewhere began investing in mining, but poor security and infrastructure have prevented any significant payout. On reconstruction program, the report said:
"$30 billion on other reconstruction programs":
Much of that money was lost to corruption and failed projects. US taxpayers have supported reconstruction efforts that include peacekeeping, refugee assistance and aid for chronic flooding, avalanches and earthquakes. Much of that money, the inspector general found, was wasted on programs that were poorly conceived or riddled with corruption. American dollars went to build hospitals that treated no patients, to schools that taught no students (and sometimes never existed at all) and to military bases the Afghans found useless and later shuttered.
The inspector general documented $15.5 billion in waste, fraud and abuse in reconstruction efforts from 2008 through 2017. Thanks to US spending, Afghanistan has seen improvements in health and education - but they are scant compared with international norms. Afghan maternal mortality remains among the highest in the world, while life expectancy is among the lowest. Most girls still receive little or no schooling, and education for boys is generally poor. There is the question of interest of money borrowed. The report said:
"$500 billion on interest":
The war has been funded with borrowed money. To finance war spending, the US borrowed heavily and will pay more than $600 billion in interest on those loans through 2023. The rest of the debt will take years to repay. It said:
"$1.4 trillion on veterans that have fought in post-9/11 wars by 2059":
Medical and disability costs will continue for decades. More than $350 billion has already gone to medical and disability care for veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Experts say that more than half of that spending belongs to the Afghanistan effort. The final total is unknown, but experts project another trillion dollars in costs over the next 40 years as wounded and disabled veterans' age and need more services.