Ill-defined laws used to gag media in Myanmar: UN
A host of ill-defined laws has been used in Myanmar to exert control over independent journalism across the country, including in Kachin, Shan and Rakhine states, a UN human rights report on freedom of expression in the country has found.
The report states that it has become "impossible for journalists to do their job without fear or favour."
While last week's conviction of two Reuters journalists-Kyaw Soe Oo and Thet Oo Maung-was a particularly outrageous and high-profile example of judicial harassment against the media in Myanmar, the report details a number of other examples of detentions and prosecutions of journalists and their sources indicative of wider trends of suppression of freedom of expression.
Laws on telecommunications, official secrets, unlawful associations, electronic transactions and even import-export and aircraft acts have been used against journalists in a number of cases over the years, the report states, according to a statement received from Geneva on Tuesday.
In one case, three journalists were among seven men arrested in June 2017 for covering an event to mark the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking in an area under the control of the Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) in northern Shan state.
Even though the journalists from The Democratic Voice of Burma and The Irrawady were covering a 'drug burning' ceremony unrelated to the armed conflict, they were charged under the Unlawful Associations Act, which is "routinely used to allege that any contact with an ethnic armed group is tantamount to a criminal offence."
"The fact that the three journalists were covering activities by TNLA that were unconnected to the conflict highlights the military's sensitivity towards any independent reporting on ethnic armed groups or from non-government controlled territory, and illustrates how promptly the authorities consider that journalists have overstepped the boundary between what they consider as acceptable and impermissible reporting," the report states. The charges were dropped after the men had spent 67 days in detention.
In another case, two Kachin Baptists were arrested in December 2016 under the same law for assisting journalists who had travelled to northern Shan State to report on the conflict there, the report states.
They were held incommunicado for several weeks and eventually received prison sentences of two years and three months under the Unlawful Associations Act as well as the Import-Export Law 2012 - the latter related to their alleged use of unlicensed motorbikes, the report states.
The Telecommunications Law, the Penal Code Section 500 and the Electronic Transactions Law, which all contain articles criminalising defamation, effectively also grant private individuals the power to stifle expression, the report adds.
The case against Swe Win, editor of the online newspaper Myanmar Now, involved a Facebook post in which he quoted a senior monk as saying that high-profile nationalist month Wirathu had violated the tenets of Buddhism. One of Wirathu's followers filed a complaint against Swe Win under the Telecommunications Law in March 2017.
Swe Win told the UN Human Rights Office that the drawn-out proceedings in the case, which have included more than 30 court appearances, have undermined his ability to do his job.
In the case of the arrest and prosecutions in 2017 of a documentary crew working for Turkish state television, the Import-Export Law 2012 was invoked in relation to their use of a drone to film the parliament building in the capital city of Nay Pyi Taw.
The charges were eventually dropped but the report states that this case illustrates the "any means to an end" approach of the authorities who will use any available legal provision to deter independent reporting on critical issues in Myanmar - in "flagrant violation of the right to freedom of expression."
The report also refers to "the instrumentalisation of the law and of the courts by the government and military in what constitutes a political campaign against independent journalism," and the "failure of the judiciary to uphold the fair trial rights of those targeted." -UNB